See Structured Healthcare AI Governance in Practice

If you’re formalizing how AI systems are evaluated, deployed, and monitored across your organization, we’ll walk you through how a healthcare-native system of record works. Our conversations are tailored to your governance model, committee structure, and regulatory environment.
Contact Details
By submitting this form, you agree to Onboard AI Terms of service and Privacy policy

Thank you!
We'll reach out soon.

We appreciate your interest and will get back to you shortly.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Contact Details

FAQ's

Frequently asked questions about healthcare AI governance, system-of-record infrastructure, and responsible AI adoption.
What is Onboard AI?
Onboard AI is the AI management system of record for healthcare organizations. It governs how AI tools are evaluated, approved, deployed, and monitored across their lifecycle. The platform produces durable, defensible records of evidence, conditions of use, and risk ownership.
How is Onboard AI different from generic AI governance or GRC tools?
Generic GRC platforms are built to manage policies, tasks, and third-party risk. Onboard AI is purpose-built for healthcare AI governance. It provides a structured AI risk evaluation pipeline — including intake and triage, assessment automation, healthcare-specific testing using FHIR standards, and a longitudinal Canonical Product Profile that captures lifecycle oversight.
Onboard AI does not replace GRC. It operationalizes AI governance within healthcare.
Does Onboard AI replace our existing compliance or monitoring systems?
No. Onboard AI can ingest tickets from existing enterprise systems, running a parallel workflow for deep, healthcare-specific AI risk evaluation, then can send the package back to your existing enterprise management tool. While Onboard AI offers a robust workflow web application, it can also be utilized purely via APIs.
What about Onboard AI is healthcare specific?
Assessments align with recognized healthcare risk frameworks such as CHAI, NIST, WHO, Join Commission, etc. and relevant state and federal regulatory requirements. 

Additionally, AI testing and monitoring is uniquely built for healthcare, leveraging FHIR APIs and data, plus recognized healthcare evaluation benchmarks.
How does Onboard AI reduce risk without slowing AI adoption?
By enforcing consistent requirements in the form of controls, evidence, ownership and mitigations, AI tools under evaluation are quickly identified according to their risk profiles. This allows AI implementers to make faster, more informed decisions based on standardized heuristics. The result is fewer stalled pilots, less work and clearer accountability.